| TC-COMMENTS-002 | @ mention triggers user dropdown in comment input | comments.feature | Then I should see an element ".mention-item": Expected element '.mention-item' not found on the page |
| TC-COMMENTS-002 | User selection via mouse click from @ mention dropdown | comments.feature | Then I should see an element ".mention-item": Expected element '.mention-item' not found on the page |
| TC-COMMENTS-003 | Submit a comment in Run Notes | comments.feature | Then I should see "Test comment from browser": Expected to see 'Test comment from browser' but it wa |
| TC-COMMENTS-004 | Email invitation interface opens from mention dropdown | comments.feature | Then I should see "Send by email": Expected to see 'Send by email' but it was not found on the page. |
| TC-COMMENTS-004 | Email invitation validates email format | comments.feature | When I click the element ".menu-button.cursor-pointer.text-blue-500": Element '.menu-button.cursor-p |
| TC-COMMENTS-005 | Email invitation delivery — submission triggers success notification | comments.feature | When I click the element ".menu-button.cursor-pointer.text-blue-500": Element '.menu-button.cursor-p |
| TC-COMMENTS-006 | Email invitation submission flow completes with valid email | comments.feature | When I click the element ".menu-button.cursor-pointer.text-blue-500": Element '.menu-button.cursor-p |
| TC-COMMENTS-009 | Notification badge present and pane accessible from run view | comments.feature | When I click the element ".icon-bell": TypeError: element.click is not a function at |
| TC-COMMENTS-018 | SUPER_ADMIN sees all mentionable users in @ dropdown with filtering | comments.feature | Then I should see an element ".mention-item": Expected element '.mention-item' not found on the page |
| TC-COMMENTS-019 | Mention dropdown shows users across comment locations | comments.feature | Then I should see an element ".mention-item": Expected element '.mention-item' not found on the page |
| TC-ERRORCODES-001 | WG12S violation produces error codes with direction suffix at target level | 165_BT-9754_ec-wg.feature | And run target "HDV" in mix "HDV" should have "WG12S_HIGH_TARGET" target error |
| TC-GLOBALUI-005 | TC-GLOBALUI-005 — Inactivity timeout terminates session after countdown expires | globalui-idle-timeout.feature | Then I wait up to 105 seconds to see "terminated due to inactivity": Text 'terminated due to inactiv |
| TV-ADJ-001-001 | CLONE - ADJ(cross-contamination) Behat(Quest) #5 | rule-adj-quest-ez-pp.feature | Then well "A2" should have "Well excluded" outcome: Failed asserting that two strings are equal. --- |
| TV-ADJ-001-001 | ADJ(cross-contamination) Behat(Quest) #5 | rule-adj-ez-sjc-v31.feature | Then well "A2" should have "Well excluded" outcome: Failed asserting that two strings are equal. --- |
| TV-ADJ-001-005 | CLONE - ADJ(cross-contamination) Behat(Quest) #5 | rule-adj-quest-ez-pp.feature | Then well "A2" should have "Well excluded" outcome: Failed asserting that two strings are equal. --- |
| TV-ADJ-001-005 | ADJ(cross-contamination) Behat(Quest) #5 | rule-adj-ez-sjc-v31.feature | Then well "A2" should have "Well excluded" outcome: Failed asserting that two strings are equal. --- |
| TV-ADJ-001-009 | CLONE - ADJ(cross-contamination) Behat(Quest) #5 | rule-adj-quest-ez-pp.feature | Then well "A2" should have "Well excluded" outcome: Failed asserting that two strings are equal. --- |
| TV-ADJ-001-009 | ADJ(cross-contamination) Behat(Quest) #5 | rule-adj-ez-sjc-v31.feature | Then well "A2" should have "Well excluded" outcome: Failed asserting that two strings are equal. --- |
| TV-ADJ-001-010 | CLONE - ADJ(cross-contamination) Behat(Quest) #5 | rule-adj-quest-ez-pp.feature | Then well "A2" should have "Well excluded" outcome: Failed asserting that two strings are equal. --- |
| TV-ADJ-001-010 | ADJ(cross-contamination) Behat(Quest) #5 | rule-adj-ez-sjc-v31.feature | Then well "A2" should have "Well excluded" outcome: Failed asserting that two strings are equal. --- |
| TV-ADJ-001-011 | CLONE - ADJ(cross-contamination) Behat(Quest) #5 | rule-adj-quest-ez-pp.feature | Then well "A2" should have "Well excluded" outcome: Failed asserting that two strings are equal. --- |
| TV-ADJ-001-011 | ADJ(cross-contamination) Behat(Quest) #5 | rule-adj-ez-sjc-v31.feature | Then well "A2" should have "Well excluded" outcome: Failed asserting that two strings are equal. --- |
| TV-ADJ-003-001 | CLONE - ADJ(cross-contamination) Behat(Quest) #5 | rule-adj-quest-ez-pp.feature | Then well "A2" should have "Well excluded" outcome: Failed asserting that two strings are equal. --- |
| TV-ADJ-003-001 | ADJ(cross-contamination) Behat(Quest) #5 | rule-adj-ez-sjc-v31.feature | Then well "A2" should have "Well excluded" outcome: Failed asserting that two strings are equal. --- |
| TV-ADJ-006-002 | Null contaminating threshold causes SQL error during config import | 75_BT-9555_null-contaminating.feature | Given The configuration "Quest_ez_pp_null_contaminating.xlsx" is loaded: SQLSTATE[23000]: Integrity |
| TV-BASELINE-EDGE-001 | EDGE-001 Target with no patient wells, auto_baseline=false -> target error applied | 147_BT-9660_baseline-target.feature | Then run target "NCOV1" in mix "COVID" should have "MANUAL_BASELINE_CHECK_TARGET" target error |
| TV-BASELINE-002-002 | TV-002-002 auto_baseline=false -> target error applied | 147_BT-9660_baseline-target.feature | And run target "NCOV1" in mix "COVID" should have "MANUAL_BASELINE_CHECK_TARGET" target error |
| TV-BASELINE-002-003 | TV-002-003 NCOV1 disabled, NCOV3 enabled -> selective target error on NCOV1 | 147_BT-9660_baseline-target.feature | And run target "NCOV1" in mix "COVID" should have "MANUAL_BASELINE_CHECK_TARGET" target error |
| TV-BASELINE-002-004 | TV-002-004 NCOV1 enabled, NCOV3 disabled -> selective target error on NCOV3 | 147_BT-9660_baseline-target.feature | And run target "NCOV3" in mix "COVID" should have "MANUAL_BASELINE_CHECK_TARGET" target error |
| TV-BASELINE-002-005 | TV-002-005 Both disabled -> both targets receive error | 147_BT-9660_baseline-target.feature | And run target "NCOV1" in mix "COVID" should have "MANUAL_BASELINE_CHECK_TARGET" target error |
| TV-BASELINE-EDGE-001 | EDGE-001 Target with no patient wells, auto_baseline=false -> target error applied | 147_BT-9660_baseline-target.feature | Then run target "NCOV1" in mix "COVID" should have "MANUAL_BASELINE_CHECK_TARGET" target error |
| TV-BPEC-001-006 | TV-001-006 Target-level failure code FAILED_POS_TARGET on negative classification | 145_BT-9635.feature | Then run target "NCOV1" in mix "COVID" should have "FAILED_POS_TARGET" target error |
| TV-COMBOUT-002-011 | NORO_COMBINED_OUTCOMES_MISSING_MIXES in two runs Archive (UNIVERSAL) #1 | rule-combout-viracor-v30roles.feature | When Upload the run file "NORO_131.json": file: 'NORO_131.json' not found with test data. (Exception |
| TV-COMBOUT-002-011 | NORO_COMBINED_OUTCOMES_MISSING_MIXES in two runs Archive (UNIVERSAL) #2 | rule-combout-viracor-v30roles.feature | When Upload the run file "NORO_132.json": file: 'NORO_132.json' not found with test data. (Exception |
| TV-COMBOUT-002-011 | NORO_COMBINED_OUTCOMES_MISSING_MIXES in two runs Archive (UNIVERSAL) #3 | rule-combout-viracor-v30roles.feature | When Upload the run file "NORO_133.json": file: 'NORO_133.json' not found with test data. (Exception |
| TV-COMBOUT-002-015 | LINEAR_REGRESSION_VALIDATION/RWAC/COMBINED_OUTCOMES test #1 #2 | rule-combout-viracor-225.feature | Then well "C3" should have "Detected" outcome: Failed asserting that two strings are equal. --- Expe |
| TV-COMBOUT-002-015 | LINEAR_REGRESSION_VALIDATION/RWAC/COMBINED_OUTCOMES test #1 #5 | rule-combout-viracor-225.feature | Then well "C3" should have "Detected" outcome: Failed asserting that two strings are equal. --- Expe |
| TV-COMBOUT-002-015 | LINEAR_REGRESSION_VALIDATION/RWAC/COMBINED_OUTCOMES test #2 #2 | rule-combout-viracor-219.feature | Then well "B3" should have "RPT" outcome: Failed asserting that two strings are equal. --- Expected |
| TV-COMBOUTCTRL-045 | TV-045 Error sets both well error and target error codes (different) | 148_BT-9628.feature | And run target "QNOROI" in mix "NOROV" should have "CLS_DISC_CTRL" target error |
| TV-COMBOUTCTRL-046 | TV-046 Same error code for both well and target error | 148_BT-9628.feature | And run target "QNOROI" in mix "NOROV" should have "CLS_DISC_CTRL" target error |
| TV-DSIGMOIDCTRL-GAP-003 | GAP-003 - Failing control adds INCORRECT_SIGMOID_TARGET in target/mix context | 57_BT-9535.feature | And run target "QHSV1" in mix "HSV" should have "INCORRECT_SIGMOID_TARGET" target error |
| TV-DSIGMOIDCTRL-GAP-004 | GAP-004 - Multiple failing observations are reported with distinct target contexts | 57_BT-9535.feature | And run target "QHSV1" in mix "HSV" should have "INCORRECT_SIGMOID_TARGET" target error |
| TV-DSIGMOIDCTRL-002-003 | GAP-003 - Failing control adds INCORRECT_SIGMOID_TARGET in target/mix context | 57_BT-9535.feature | And run target "QHSV1" in mix "HSV" should have "INCORRECT_SIGMOID_TARGET" target error |
| TV-DSIGMOIDCTRL-002-005 | GAP-004 - Multiple failing observations are reported with distinct target contexts | 57_BT-9535.feature | And run target "QHSV1" in mix "HSV" should have "INCORRECT_SIGMOID_TARGET" target error |
| TV-DSIGMOIDCTRL-GAP-003 | GAP-003 - Failing control adds INCORRECT_SIGMOID_TARGET in target/mix context | 57_BT-9535.feature | And run target "QHSV1" in mix "HSV" should have "INCORRECT_SIGMOID_TARGET" target error |
| TV-DSIGMOIDCTRL-GAP-004 | GAP-004 - Multiple failing observations are reported with distinct target contexts | 57_BT-9535.feature | And run target "QHSV1" in mix "HSV" should have "INCORRECT_SIGMOID_TARGET" target error |
| TV-EXTCTRL-001-003 | GAPDH_ENT associated error resolving(UNIVERSAL) #1 | rule-sysinh-viracor225.feature | Then well "C3" should have "An associated extraction control has failed. That error must be resolved |
| TV-EXTCTRL-001-003 | GAPDH_ENT associated error resolving(UNIVERSAL) #2 | rule-sysinh-viracor225.feature | Then well "C3" should have "An associated extraction control has failed. That error must be resolved |
| TV-EXTCTRL-001-003 | GAPDH_ENT associated error resolving(UNIVERSAL) #3 | rule-sysinh-viracor225.feature | Then well "C3" should have "An associated extraction control has failed. That error must be resolved |
| TV-EXTCTRL-001-005 | GAPDH_ENT associated error resolving(UNIVERSAL) #1 | rule-sysinh-viracor225.feature | Then well "C3" should have "An associated extraction control has failed. That error must be resolved |
| TV-EXTCTRL-001-005 | GAPDH_ENT associated error resolving(UNIVERSAL) #2 | rule-sysinh-viracor225.feature | Then well "C3" should have "An associated extraction control has failed. That error must be resolved |
| TV-EXTCTRL-001-005 | GAPDH_ENT associated error resolving(UNIVERSAL) #3 | rule-sysinh-viracor225.feature | Then well "C3" should have "An associated extraction control has failed. That error must be resolved |
| TV-MIXMISS-003-002 | TV-003-002 Partial mixes uploaded - only patient 501 resolved, patient 502 still missing | 37_BT-9515_config.feature | Then well "A1" should have "Not Detected" outcome: Failed asserting that two strings are equal. --- |
| TV-MIXMISS-003-004 | TV-003-004 Full mix upload resolves mixes missing after re-analysis | 37_BT-9515_config.feature | Then well "A1" should have "Not Detected" outcome: Failed asserting that two strings are equal. --- |
| TV-MWCOMBOUT-001-008 | NORO_COMBINED_OUTCOMES_MISSING_MIXES in two runs Archive (UNIVERSAL) #1 | rule-combout-viracor-v30roles.feature | When Upload the run file "NORO_131.json": file: 'NORO_131.json' not found with test data. (Exception |
| TV-MWCOMBOUT-001-008 | NORO_COMBINED_OUTCOMES_MISSING_MIXES in two runs Archive (UNIVERSAL) #2 | rule-combout-viracor-v30roles.feature | When Upload the run file "NORO_132.json": file: 'NORO_132.json' not found with test data. (Exception |
| TV-MWCOMBOUT-001-008 | NORO_COMBINED_OUTCOMES_MISSING_MIXES in two runs Archive (UNIVERSAL) #3 | rule-combout-viracor-v30roles.feature | When Upload the run file "NORO_133.json": file: 'NORO_133.json' not found with test data. (Exception |
| TV-NOTTSQM-001-002 | NOTTSQM concentration factor test - TV-001-008 Negative concentration factor (-1) overflow #1 | 16_BT-9201.feature | When Upload the run file "NOTTSQM_CF_NEG1.json": SQLSTATE[22003]: Numeric value out of range: 1264 O |
| TV-NOTTSQM-001-004 | NOTTSQM concentration factor test - TV-001-008 Negative concentration factor (-1) overflow #1 | 16_BT-9201.feature | When Upload the run file "NOTTSQM_CF_NEG1.json": SQLSTATE[22003]: Numeric value out of range: 1264 O |
| TV-NOTTSQM-001-005 | NOTTSQM concentration factor test - TV-001-008 Negative concentration factor (-1) overflow #1 | 16_BT-9201.feature | When Upload the run file "NOTTSQM_CF_NEG1.json": SQLSTATE[22003]: Numeric value out of range: 1264 O |
| TV-NOTTSQM-001-006 | NOTTSQM concentration factor test - TV-001-008 Negative concentration factor (-1) overflow #1 | 16_BT-9201.feature | When Upload the run file "NOTTSQM_CF_NEG1.json": SQLSTATE[22003]: Numeric value out of range: 1264 O |
| TV-NOTTSQM-001-007 | NOTTSQM concentration factor test - TV-001-008 Negative concentration factor (-1) overflow #1 | 16_BT-9201.feature | When Upload the run file "NOTTSQM_CF_NEG1.json": SQLSTATE[22003]: Numeric value out of range: 1264 O |
| TV-NOTTSQM-001-008 | NOTTSQM concentration factor test - TV-001-008 Negative concentration factor (-1) overflow #1 | 16_BT-9201.feature | When Upload the run file "NOTTSQM_CF_NEG1.json": SQLSTATE[22003]: Numeric value out of range: 1264 O |
| TV-QUANTVAL-006-003 | LINEAR_REGRESSION_VALIDATION/RWAC/COMBINED_OUTCOMES test #1 #2 | rule-combout-viracor-225.feature | Then well "C3" should have "Detected" outcome: Failed asserting that two strings are equal. --- Expe |
| TV-QUANTVAL-006-003 | LINEAR_REGRESSION_VALIDATION/RWAC/COMBINED_OUTCOMES test #1 #5 | rule-combout-viracor-225.feature | Then well "C3" should have "Detected" outcome: Failed asserting that two strings are equal. --- Expe |
| TV-QUANTVAL-006-003 | LINEAR_REGRESSION_VALIDATION/RWAC/COMBINED_OUTCOMES test #2 #2 | rule-combout-viracor-219.feature | Then well "B3" should have "RPT" outcome: Failed asserting that two strings are equal. --- Expected |
| TV-REPEATSAMP-001-001 | WREP EDIT widget exclude run Behat #7 | rule-small-rules-viracor-v31.feature | Then The run file "WREP_CLS_2_XO.json" should contains run status "Results for wells in this run may |
| TV-REPEATSAMP-001-003 | WREP EDIT widget exclude run Behat #7 | rule-small-rules-viracor-v31.feature | Then The run file "WREP_CLS_2_XO.json" should contains run status "Results for wells in this run may |
| TV-REPEATSAMP-001-003 | WREP MR widget exclude run Behat #8 | rule-small-rules-viracor-v30roles.feature | Then The run file "WREP_LOG_QUANT_3_XO.json" should contains run status "Results for wells in this r |
| TV-REPEATSAMP-001-004 | WREP MR widget exclude run Behat #8 | rule-small-rules-viracor-v30roles.feature | Then The run file "WREP_LOG_QUANT_3_XO.json" should contains run status "Results for wells in this r |
| TV-REPEATSAMP-001-005 | WREP MR widget exclude run Behat #8 | rule-small-rules-viracor-v30roles.feature | Then The run file "WREP_LOG_QUANT_3_XO.json" should contains run status "Results for wells in this r |
| TV-REPEATSAMP-001-006 | WREP MR widget exclude run Behat #8 | rule-small-rules-viracor-v30roles.feature | Then The run file "WREP_LOG_QUANT_3_XO.json" should contains run status "Results for wells in this r |
| TV-REPEATSAMP-001-007 | WREP EDIT widget exclude run Behat #7 | rule-small-rules-viracor-v31.feature | Then The run file "WREP_CLS_2_XO.json" should contains run status "Results for wells in this run may |
| TV-REPEATSAMP-001-007 | WREP MR widget exclude run Behat #8 | rule-small-rules-viracor-v30roles.feature | Then The run file "WREP_LOG_QUANT_3_XO.json" should contains run status "Results for wells in this r |
| TV-REPEATSAMP-001-008 | WREP MR widget exclude run Behat #8 | rule-small-rules-viracor-v30roles.feature | Then The run file "WREP_LOG_QUANT_3_XO.json" should contains run status "Results for wells in this r |
| TV-REPEATSAMP-001-009 | WREP MR widget exclude run Behat #8 | rule-small-rules-viracor-v30roles.feature | Then The run file "WREP_LOG_QUANT_3_XO.json" should contains run status "Results for wells in this r |
| TV-REPEATSAMP-001-010 | WREP MR widget exclude run Behat #8 | rule-small-rules-viracor-v30roles.feature | Then The run file "WREP_LOG_QUANT_3_XO.json" should contains run status "Results for wells in this r |
| TV-REPEATSAMP-001-013 | WREP MR widget exclude run Behat #8 | rule-small-rules-viracor-v30roles.feature | Then The run file "WREP_LOG_QUANT_3_XO.json" should contains run status "Results for wells in this r |
| TV-REPEATSAMP-001-014 | WREP MR widget exclude run Behat #8 | rule-small-rules-viracor-v30roles.feature | Then The run file "WREP_LOG_QUANT_3_XO.json" should contains run status "Results for wells in this r |
| TV-RWAC-001-005 | GAPDH_ENT associated error resolving(UNIVERSAL) #1 | rule-sysinh-viracor225.feature | Then well "C3" should have "An associated extraction control has failed. That error must be resolved |
| TV-RWAC-001-005 | GAPDH_ENT associated error resolving(UNIVERSAL) #2 | rule-sysinh-viracor225.feature | Then well "C3" should have "An associated extraction control has failed. That error must be resolved |
| TV-RWAC-001-005 | GAPDH_ENT associated error resolving(UNIVERSAL) #3 | rule-sysinh-viracor225.feature | Then well "C3" should have "An associated extraction control has failed. That error must be resolved |
| TV-RWAC-001-006 | GAPDH_ENT associated error resolving(UNIVERSAL) #1 | rule-sysinh-viracor225.feature | Then well "C3" should have "An associated extraction control has failed. That error must be resolved |
| TV-RWAC-001-006 | GAPDH_ENT associated error resolving(UNIVERSAL) #2 | rule-sysinh-viracor225.feature | Then well "C3" should have "An associated extraction control has failed. That error must be resolved |
| TV-RWAC-001-006 | GAPDH_ENT associated error resolving(UNIVERSAL) #3 | rule-sysinh-viracor225.feature | Then well "C3" should have "An associated extraction control has failed. That error must be resolved |
| TV-RWAC-001-007 | GAPDH_ENT associated error resolving(UNIVERSAL) #1 | rule-sysinh-viracor225.feature | Then well "C3" should have "An associated extraction control has failed. That error must be resolved |
| TV-RWAC-001-007 | GAPDH_ENT associated error resolving(UNIVERSAL) #2 | rule-sysinh-viracor225.feature | Then well "C3" should have "An associated extraction control has failed. That error must be resolved |
| TV-RWAC-001-007 | GAPDH_ENT associated error resolving(UNIVERSAL) #3 | rule-sysinh-viracor225.feature | Then well "C3" should have "An associated extraction control has failed. That error must be resolved |
| TV-RWAC-003-004 | GAPDH_ENT associated error resolving(UNIVERSAL) #1 | rule-sysinh-viracor225.feature | Then well "C3" should have "An associated extraction control has failed. That error must be resolved |
| TV-RWAC-003-004 | GAPDH_ENT associated error resolving(UNIVERSAL) #2 | rule-sysinh-viracor225.feature | Then well "C3" should have "An associated extraction control has failed. That error must be resolved |
| TV-RWAC-003-004 | GAPDH_ENT associated error resolving(UNIVERSAL) #3 | rule-sysinh-viracor225.feature | Then well "C3" should have "An associated extraction control has failed. That error must be resolved |
| TV-SYSINH-001-008 | SYSTEMIC_INHIBITION rule base 2 (v3.0.1) #1 | rule-sysinh-viracor-prod.feature | And well "A2" should have "Internal Control is inhibited. Report 'INHP'." outcome: Failed asserting |
| TV-SYSINH-001-022 | SYSTEMIC_INHIBITION rule base 2 (v3.0.1) #1 | rule-sysinh-viracor-prod.feature | And well "A2" should have "Internal Control is inhibited. Report 'INHP'." outcome: Failed asserting |
| TV-WG-002-005 | Westgard re-analyse different dates #2 | rule-wg-viracor225.feature | Then well "A1" should have "Control Passed" outcome: Failed asserting that two strings are equal. -- |
| TV-WG-002-006 | Westgard re-analyse different dates #2 | rule-wg-viracor225.feature | Then well "A1" should have "Control Passed" outcome: Failed asserting that two strings are equal. -- |
| TV-WG-003-001 | Westgard 3 runs test #1 | rule-wg-viracor225.feature | And well "A41" should have "Control Passed" outcome: Failed asserting that two strings are equal. -- |
| TV-WG-003-001 | Westgard 3 runs test #2 | rule-wg-viracor225.feature | Then well "A41" should have "Control Passed" outcome: Failed asserting that two strings are equal. - |
| TV-WG-003-003 | Westgard re-analyse different dates #2 | rule-wg-viracor225.feature | Then well "A1" should have "Control Passed" outcome: Failed asserting that two strings are equal. -- |
| TV-WG-003-004 | Westgard 3 runs test #1 | rule-wg-viracor225.feature | And well "A41" should have "Control Passed" outcome: Failed asserting that two strings are equal. -- |
| TV-WG-003-004 | Westgard 3 runs test #2 | rule-wg-viracor225.feature | Then well "A41" should have "Control Passed" outcome: Failed asserting that two strings are equal. - |
| TV-WG-003-007 | Westgard re-analyse status 2 #1 | rule-wg-viracor225.feature | Then well "A1" should have "A previous Westgard control has failed for this mix." outcome: Failed as |
| TV-WG-006-008 | Westgards 13s7t client case(viracor) #2 | rule-wg-viracor225.feature | Then well "A1" should have "Control Passed" outcome: Failed asserting that two strings are equal. -- |
| TV-WG-010-007 | Westgard re-analyse different dates #2 | rule-wg-viracor225.feature | Then well "A1" should have "Control Passed" outcome: Failed asserting that two strings are equal. -- |
| TV-WG-012-005 | Westgards 13s7t client case(viracor) #2 | rule-wg-viracor225.feature | Then well "A1" should have "Control Passed" outcome: Failed asserting that two strings are equal. -- |
| TV-WG-012-007 | Westgards 13s7t client case(viracor) #2 | rule-wg-viracor225.feature | Then well "A1" should have "Control Passed" outcome: Failed asserting that two strings are equal. -- |
| TV-WG-013-001 | Westgards 13s7t client case(viracor) #2 | rule-wg-viracor225.feature | Then well "A1" should have "Control Passed" outcome: Failed asserting that two strings are equal. -- |
| TV-WG-013-003 | WG7T13S does not trigger when trend direction mismatches delta direction | 39_BT-9517_wg-boundary.feature | Then well "A1" should have "Control Passed" outcome: Failed asserting that two strings are equal. -- |
| TV-WG-013-004 | Westgards 13s7t client case(viracor) #2 | rule-wg-viracor225.feature | Then well "A1" should have "Control Passed" outcome: Failed asserting that two strings are equal. -- |
| TV-WG-013-005 | Westgards 13s7t client case(viracor) #2 | rule-wg-viracor225.feature | Then well "A1" should have "Control Passed" outcome: Failed asserting that two strings are equal. -- |
| TV-WG-013-006 | Westgards 13s7t client case(viracor) #2 | rule-wg-viracor225.feature | Then well "A1" should have "Control Passed" outcome: Failed asserting that two strings are equal. -- |
| TV-WG-013-008 | Westgards 13s7t client case(viracor) #2 | rule-wg-viracor225.feature | Then well "A1" should have "Control Passed" outcome: Failed asserting that two strings are equal. -- |
| TV-WG-013-009 | Westgards 13s7t client case(viracor) #2 | rule-wg-viracor225.feature | Then well "A1" should have "Control Passed" outcome: Failed asserting that two strings are equal. -- |
| TV-WG-013-010 | Westgards 13s7t client case(viracor) #2 | rule-wg-viracor225.feature | Then well "A1" should have "Control Passed" outcome: Failed asserting that two strings are equal. -- |
| TV-WG-002-005 | Westgard re-analyse different dates #2 | rule-wg-viracor225.feature | Then well "A1" should have "Control Passed" outcome: Failed asserting that two strings are equal. -- |
| TV-WG-002-006 | Westgard re-analyse different dates #2 | rule-wg-viracor225.feature | Then well "A1" should have "Control Passed" outcome: Failed asserting that two strings are equal. -- |
| TV-WG-003-001 | Westgard 3 runs test #1 | rule-wg-viracor225.feature | And well "A41" should have "Control Passed" outcome: Failed asserting that two strings are equal. -- |
| TV-WG-003-001 | Westgard 3 runs test #2 | rule-wg-viracor225.feature | Then well "A41" should have "Control Passed" outcome: Failed asserting that two strings are equal. - |
| TV-WG-003-003 | Westgard re-analyse different dates #2 | rule-wg-viracor225.feature | Then well "A1" should have "Control Passed" outcome: Failed asserting that two strings are equal. -- |
| TV-WG-003-004 | Westgard 3 runs test #1 | rule-wg-viracor225.feature | And well "A41" should have "Control Passed" outcome: Failed asserting that two strings are equal. -- |
| TV-WG-003-004 | Westgard 3 runs test #2 | rule-wg-viracor225.feature | Then well "A41" should have "Control Passed" outcome: Failed asserting that two strings are equal. - |
| TV-WG-003-007 | Westgard re-analyse status 2 #1 | rule-wg-viracor225.feature | Then well "A1" should have "A previous Westgard control has failed for this mix." outcome: Failed as |
| TV-WG-006-008 | Westgards 13s7t client case(viracor) #2 | rule-wg-viracor225.feature | Then well "A1" should have "Control Passed" outcome: Failed asserting that two strings are equal. -- |
| TV-WG-010-007 | Westgard re-analyse different dates #2 | rule-wg-viracor225.feature | Then well "A1" should have "Control Passed" outcome: Failed asserting that two strings are equal. -- |
| TV-WG-012-005 | Westgards 13s7t client case(viracor) #2 | rule-wg-viracor225.feature | Then well "A1" should have "Control Passed" outcome: Failed asserting that two strings are equal. -- |
| TV-WG-012-007 | Westgards 13s7t client case(viracor) #2 | rule-wg-viracor225.feature | Then well "A1" should have "Control Passed" outcome: Failed asserting that two strings are equal. -- |
| TV-WG-013-001 | Westgards 13s7t client case(viracor) #2 | rule-wg-viracor225.feature | Then well "A1" should have "Control Passed" outcome: Failed asserting that two strings are equal. -- |
| TV-WG-013-003 | WG7T13S does not trigger when trend direction mismatches delta direction | 39_BT-9517_wg-boundary.feature | Then well "A1" should have "Control Passed" outcome: Failed asserting that two strings are equal. -- |
| TV-WG-013-004 | Westgards 13s7t client case(viracor) #2 | rule-wg-viracor225.feature | Then well "A1" should have "Control Passed" outcome: Failed asserting that two strings are equal. -- |
| TV-WG-013-005 | Westgards 13s7t client case(viracor) #2 | rule-wg-viracor225.feature | Then well "A1" should have "Control Passed" outcome: Failed asserting that two strings are equal. -- |
| TV-WG-013-006 | Westgards 13s7t client case(viracor) #2 | rule-wg-viracor225.feature | Then well "A1" should have "Control Passed" outcome: Failed asserting that two strings are equal. -- |
| TV-WG-013-008 | Westgards 13s7t client case(viracor) #2 | rule-wg-viracor225.feature | Then well "A1" should have "Control Passed" outcome: Failed asserting that two strings are equal. -- |
| TV-WG-013-009 | Westgards 13s7t client case(viracor) #2 | rule-wg-viracor225.feature | Then well "A1" should have "Control Passed" outcome: Failed asserting that two strings are equal. -- |
| TV-WG-013-010 | Westgards 13s7t client case(viracor) #2 | rule-wg-viracor225.feature | Then well "A1" should have "Control Passed" outcome: Failed asserting that two strings are equal. -- |
| TV-WG-002-005 | Westgard re-analyse different dates #2 | rule-wg-viracor225.feature | Then well "A1" should have "Control Passed" outcome: Failed asserting that two strings are equal. -- |
| TV-WG-002-006 | Westgard re-analyse different dates #2 | rule-wg-viracor225.feature | Then well "A1" should have "Control Passed" outcome: Failed asserting that two strings are equal. -- |
| TV-WG-003-001 | Westgard 3 runs test #1 | rule-wg-viracor225.feature | And well "A41" should have "Control Passed" outcome: Failed asserting that two strings are equal. -- |
| TV-WG-003-001 | Westgard 3 runs test #2 | rule-wg-viracor225.feature | Then well "A41" should have "Control Passed" outcome: Failed asserting that two strings are equal. - |
| TV-WG-003-003 | Westgard re-analyse different dates #2 | rule-wg-viracor225.feature | Then well "A1" should have "Control Passed" outcome: Failed asserting that two strings are equal. -- |
| TV-WG-003-004 | Westgard 3 runs test #1 | rule-wg-viracor225.feature | And well "A41" should have "Control Passed" outcome: Failed asserting that two strings are equal. -- |
| TV-WG-003-004 | Westgard 3 runs test #2 | rule-wg-viracor225.feature | Then well "A41" should have "Control Passed" outcome: Failed asserting that two strings are equal. - |
| TV-WG-003-007 | Westgard re-analyse status 2 #1 | rule-wg-viracor225.feature | Then well "A1" should have "A previous Westgard control has failed for this mix." outcome: Failed as |
| TV-WG-006-008 | Westgards 13s7t client case(viracor) #2 | rule-wg-viracor225.feature | Then well "A1" should have "Control Passed" outcome: Failed asserting that two strings are equal. -- |
| TV-WG-010-007 | Westgard re-analyse different dates #2 | rule-wg-viracor225.feature | Then well "A1" should have "Control Passed" outcome: Failed asserting that two strings are equal. -- |
| TV-WG-012-005 | Westgards 13s7t client case(viracor) #2 | rule-wg-viracor225.feature | Then well "A1" should have "Control Passed" outcome: Failed asserting that two strings are equal. -- |
| TV-WG-012-007 | Westgards 13s7t client case(viracor) #2 | rule-wg-viracor225.feature | Then well "A1" should have "Control Passed" outcome: Failed asserting that two strings are equal. -- |
| TV-WG-013-001 | Westgards 13s7t client case(viracor) #2 | rule-wg-viracor225.feature | Then well "A1" should have "Control Passed" outcome: Failed asserting that two strings are equal. -- |
| TV-WG-013-003 | WG7T13S does not trigger when trend direction mismatches delta direction | 39_BT-9517_wg-boundary.feature | Then well "A1" should have "Control Passed" outcome: Failed asserting that two strings are equal. -- |
| TV-WG-013-004 | Westgards 13s7t client case(viracor) #2 | rule-wg-viracor225.feature | Then well "A1" should have "Control Passed" outcome: Failed asserting that two strings are equal. -- |
| TV-WG-013-005 | Westgards 13s7t client case(viracor) #2 | rule-wg-viracor225.feature | Then well "A1" should have "Control Passed" outcome: Failed asserting that two strings are equal. -- |
| TV-WG-013-006 | Westgards 13s7t client case(viracor) #2 | rule-wg-viracor225.feature | Then well "A1" should have "Control Passed" outcome: Failed asserting that two strings are equal. -- |
| TV-WG-013-008 | Westgards 13s7t client case(viracor) #2 | rule-wg-viracor225.feature | Then well "A1" should have "Control Passed" outcome: Failed asserting that two strings are equal. -- |
| TV-WG-013-009 | Westgards 13s7t client case(viracor) #2 | rule-wg-viracor225.feature | Then well "A1" should have "Control Passed" outcome: Failed asserting that two strings are equal. -- |
| TV-WG-013-010 | Westgards 13s7t client case(viracor) #2 | rule-wg-viracor225.feature | Then well "A1" should have "Control Passed" outcome: Failed asserting that two strings are equal. -- |
| TV-WG-002-005 | Westgard re-analyse different dates #2 | rule-wg-viracor225.feature | Then well "A1" should have "Control Passed" outcome: Failed asserting that two strings are equal. -- |
| TV-WG-002-006 | Westgard re-analyse different dates #2 | rule-wg-viracor225.feature | Then well "A1" should have "Control Passed" outcome: Failed asserting that two strings are equal. -- |
| TV-WG-003-001 | Westgard 3 runs test #1 | rule-wg-viracor225.feature | And well "A41" should have "Control Passed" outcome: Failed asserting that two strings are equal. -- |
| TV-WG-003-001 | Westgard 3 runs test #2 | rule-wg-viracor225.feature | Then well "A41" should have "Control Passed" outcome: Failed asserting that two strings are equal. - |
| TV-WG-003-003 | Westgard re-analyse different dates #2 | rule-wg-viracor225.feature | Then well "A1" should have "Control Passed" outcome: Failed asserting that two strings are equal. -- |
| TV-WG-003-004 | Westgard 3 runs test #1 | rule-wg-viracor225.feature | And well "A41" should have "Control Passed" outcome: Failed asserting that two strings are equal. -- |
| TV-WG-003-004 | Westgard 3 runs test #2 | rule-wg-viracor225.feature | Then well "A41" should have "Control Passed" outcome: Failed asserting that two strings are equal. - |
| TV-WG-003-007 | Westgard re-analyse status 2 #1 | rule-wg-viracor225.feature | Then well "A1" should have "A previous Westgard control has failed for this mix." outcome: Failed as |
| TV-WG-006-008 | Westgards 13s7t client case(viracor) #2 | rule-wg-viracor225.feature | Then well "A1" should have "Control Passed" outcome: Failed asserting that two strings are equal. -- |
| TV-WG-010-007 | Westgard re-analyse different dates #2 | rule-wg-viracor225.feature | Then well "A1" should have "Control Passed" outcome: Failed asserting that two strings are equal. -- |
| TV-WG-012-005 | Westgards 13s7t client case(viracor) #2 | rule-wg-viracor225.feature | Then well "A1" should have "Control Passed" outcome: Failed asserting that two strings are equal. -- |
| TV-WG-012-007 | Westgards 13s7t client case(viracor) #2 | rule-wg-viracor225.feature | Then well "A1" should have "Control Passed" outcome: Failed asserting that two strings are equal. -- |
| TV-WG-013-001 | Westgards 13s7t client case(viracor) #2 | rule-wg-viracor225.feature | Then well "A1" should have "Control Passed" outcome: Failed asserting that two strings are equal. -- |
| TV-WG-013-003 | WG7T13S does not trigger when trend direction mismatches delta direction | 39_BT-9517_wg-boundary.feature | Then well "A1" should have "Control Passed" outcome: Failed asserting that two strings are equal. -- |
| TV-WG-013-004 | Westgards 13s7t client case(viracor) #2 | rule-wg-viracor225.feature | Then well "A1" should have "Control Passed" outcome: Failed asserting that two strings are equal. -- |
| TV-WG-013-005 | Westgards 13s7t client case(viracor) #2 | rule-wg-viracor225.feature | Then well "A1" should have "Control Passed" outcome: Failed asserting that two strings are equal. -- |
| TV-WG-013-006 | Westgards 13s7t client case(viracor) #2 | rule-wg-viracor225.feature | Then well "A1" should have "Control Passed" outcome: Failed asserting that two strings are equal. -- |
| TV-WG-013-008 | Westgards 13s7t client case(viracor) #2 | rule-wg-viracor225.feature | Then well "A1" should have "Control Passed" outcome: Failed asserting that two strings are equal. -- |
| TV-WG-013-009 | Westgards 13s7t client case(viracor) #2 | rule-wg-viracor225.feature | Then well "A1" should have "Control Passed" outcome: Failed asserting that two strings are equal. -- |
| TV-WG-013-010 | Westgards 13s7t client case(viracor) #2 | rule-wg-viracor225.feature | Then well "A1" should have "Control Passed" outcome: Failed asserting that two strings are equal. -- |
| TV-WG-002-005 | Westgard re-analyse different dates #2 | rule-wg-viracor225.feature | Then well "A1" should have "Control Passed" outcome: Failed asserting that two strings are equal. -- |
| TV-WG-002-006 | Westgard re-analyse different dates #2 | rule-wg-viracor225.feature | Then well "A1" should have "Control Passed" outcome: Failed asserting that two strings are equal. -- |
| TV-WG-003-001 | Westgard 3 runs test #1 | rule-wg-viracor225.feature | And well "A41" should have "Control Passed" outcome: Failed asserting that two strings are equal. -- |
| TV-WG-003-001 | Westgard 3 runs test #2 | rule-wg-viracor225.feature | Then well "A41" should have "Control Passed" outcome: Failed asserting that two strings are equal. - |
| TV-WG-003-003 | Westgard re-analyse different dates #2 | rule-wg-viracor225.feature | Then well "A1" should have "Control Passed" outcome: Failed asserting that two strings are equal. -- |
| TV-WG-003-004 | Westgard 3 runs test #1 | rule-wg-viracor225.feature | And well "A41" should have "Control Passed" outcome: Failed asserting that two strings are equal. -- |
| TV-WG-003-004 | Westgard 3 runs test #2 | rule-wg-viracor225.feature | Then well "A41" should have "Control Passed" outcome: Failed asserting that two strings are equal. - |
| TV-WG-003-007 | Westgard re-analyse status 2 #1 | rule-wg-viracor225.feature | Then well "A1" should have "A previous Westgard control has failed for this mix." outcome: Failed as |
| TV-WG-006-008 | Westgards 13s7t client case(viracor) #2 | rule-wg-viracor225.feature | Then well "A1" should have "Control Passed" outcome: Failed asserting that two strings are equal. -- |
| TV-WG-010-007 | Westgard re-analyse different dates #2 | rule-wg-viracor225.feature | Then well "A1" should have "Control Passed" outcome: Failed asserting that two strings are equal. -- |
| TV-WG-012-005 | Westgards 13s7t client case(viracor) #2 | rule-wg-viracor225.feature | Then well "A1" should have "Control Passed" outcome: Failed asserting that two strings are equal. -- |
| TV-WG-012-007 | Westgards 13s7t client case(viracor) #2 | rule-wg-viracor225.feature | Then well "A1" should have "Control Passed" outcome: Failed asserting that two strings are equal. -- |
| TV-WG-013-001 | Westgards 13s7t client case(viracor) #2 | rule-wg-viracor225.feature | Then well "A1" should have "Control Passed" outcome: Failed asserting that two strings are equal. -- |
| TV-WG-013-003 | WG7T13S does not trigger when trend direction mismatches delta direction | 39_BT-9517_wg-boundary.feature | Then well "A1" should have "Control Passed" outcome: Failed asserting that two strings are equal. -- |
| TV-WG-013-004 | Westgards 13s7t client case(viracor) #2 | rule-wg-viracor225.feature | Then well "A1" should have "Control Passed" outcome: Failed asserting that two strings are equal. -- |
| TV-WG-013-005 | Westgards 13s7t client case(viracor) #2 | rule-wg-viracor225.feature | Then well "A1" should have "Control Passed" outcome: Failed asserting that two strings are equal. -- |
| TV-WG-013-006 | Westgards 13s7t client case(viracor) #2 | rule-wg-viracor225.feature | Then well "A1" should have "Control Passed" outcome: Failed asserting that two strings are equal. -- |
| TV-WG-013-008 | Westgards 13s7t client case(viracor) #2 | rule-wg-viracor225.feature | Then well "A1" should have "Control Passed" outcome: Failed asserting that two strings are equal. -- |
| TV-WG-013-009 | Westgards 13s7t client case(viracor) #2 | rule-wg-viracor225.feature | Then well "A1" should have "Control Passed" outcome: Failed asserting that two strings are equal. -- |
| TV-WG-013-010 | Westgards 13s7t client case(viracor) #2 | rule-wg-viracor225.feature | Then well "A1" should have "Control Passed" outcome: Failed asserting that two strings are equal. -- |
| TV-WG-002-005 | Westgard re-analyse different dates #2 | rule-wg-viracor225.feature | Then well "A1" should have "Control Passed" outcome: Failed asserting that two strings are equal. -- |
| TV-WG-002-006 | Westgard re-analyse different dates #2 | rule-wg-viracor225.feature | Then well "A1" should have "Control Passed" outcome: Failed asserting that two strings are equal. -- |
| TV-WG-003-001 | Westgard 3 runs test #1 | rule-wg-viracor225.feature | And well "A41" should have "Control Passed" outcome: Failed asserting that two strings are equal. -- |
| TV-WG-003-001 | Westgard 3 runs test #2 | rule-wg-viracor225.feature | Then well "A41" should have "Control Passed" outcome: Failed asserting that two strings are equal. - |
| TV-WG-003-003 | Westgard re-analyse different dates #2 | rule-wg-viracor225.feature | Then well "A1" should have "Control Passed" outcome: Failed asserting that two strings are equal. -- |
| TV-WG-003-004 | Westgard 3 runs test #1 | rule-wg-viracor225.feature | And well "A41" should have "Control Passed" outcome: Failed asserting that two strings are equal. -- |
| TV-WG-003-004 | Westgard 3 runs test #2 | rule-wg-viracor225.feature | Then well "A41" should have "Control Passed" outcome: Failed asserting that two strings are equal. - |
| TV-WG-003-007 | Westgard re-analyse status 2 #1 | rule-wg-viracor225.feature | Then well "A1" should have "A previous Westgard control has failed for this mix." outcome: Failed as |
| TV-WG-006-008 | Westgards 13s7t client case(viracor) #2 | rule-wg-viracor225.feature | Then well "A1" should have "Control Passed" outcome: Failed asserting that two strings are equal. -- |
| TV-WG-010-007 | Westgard re-analyse different dates #2 | rule-wg-viracor225.feature | Then well "A1" should have "Control Passed" outcome: Failed asserting that two strings are equal. -- |
| TV-WG-012-005 | Westgards 13s7t client case(viracor) #2 | rule-wg-viracor225.feature | Then well "A1" should have "Control Passed" outcome: Failed asserting that two strings are equal. -- |
| TV-WG-012-007 | Westgards 13s7t client case(viracor) #2 | rule-wg-viracor225.feature | Then well "A1" should have "Control Passed" outcome: Failed asserting that two strings are equal. -- |
| TV-WG-013-001 | Westgards 13s7t client case(viracor) #2 | rule-wg-viracor225.feature | Then well "A1" should have "Control Passed" outcome: Failed asserting that two strings are equal. -- |
| TV-WG-013-003 | WG7T13S does not trigger when trend direction mismatches delta direction | 39_BT-9517_wg-boundary.feature | Then well "A1" should have "Control Passed" outcome: Failed asserting that two strings are equal. -- |
| TV-WG-013-004 | Westgards 13s7t client case(viracor) #2 | rule-wg-viracor225.feature | Then well "A1" should have "Control Passed" outcome: Failed asserting that two strings are equal. -- |
| TV-WG-013-005 | Westgards 13s7t client case(viracor) #2 | rule-wg-viracor225.feature | Then well "A1" should have "Control Passed" outcome: Failed asserting that two strings are equal. -- |
| TV-WG-013-006 | Westgards 13s7t client case(viracor) #2 | rule-wg-viracor225.feature | Then well "A1" should have "Control Passed" outcome: Failed asserting that two strings are equal. -- |
| TV-WG-013-008 | Westgards 13s7t client case(viracor) #2 | rule-wg-viracor225.feature | Then well "A1" should have "Control Passed" outcome: Failed asserting that two strings are equal. -- |
| TV-WG-013-009 | Westgards 13s7t client case(viracor) #2 | rule-wg-viracor225.feature | Then well "A1" should have "Control Passed" outcome: Failed asserting that two strings are equal. -- |
| TV-WG-013-010 | Westgards 13s7t client case(viracor) #2 | rule-wg-viracor225.feature | Then well "A1" should have "Control Passed" outcome: Failed asserting that two strings are equal. -- |
| TV-WG-002-005 | Westgard re-analyse different dates #2 | rule-wg-viracor225.feature | Then well "A1" should have "Control Passed" outcome: Failed asserting that two strings are equal. -- |
| TV-WG-002-006 | Westgard re-analyse different dates #2 | rule-wg-viracor225.feature | Then well "A1" should have "Control Passed" outcome: Failed asserting that two strings are equal. -- |
| TV-WG-003-001 | Westgard 3 runs test #1 | rule-wg-viracor225.feature | And well "A41" should have "Control Passed" outcome: Failed asserting that two strings are equal. -- |
| TV-WG-003-001 | Westgard 3 runs test #2 | rule-wg-viracor225.feature | Then well "A41" should have "Control Passed" outcome: Failed asserting that two strings are equal. - |
| TV-WG-003-003 | Westgard re-analyse different dates #2 | rule-wg-viracor225.feature | Then well "A1" should have "Control Passed" outcome: Failed asserting that two strings are equal. -- |
| TV-WG-003-004 | Westgard 3 runs test #1 | rule-wg-viracor225.feature | And well "A41" should have "Control Passed" outcome: Failed asserting that two strings are equal. -- |
| TV-WG-003-004 | Westgard 3 runs test #2 | rule-wg-viracor225.feature | Then well "A41" should have "Control Passed" outcome: Failed asserting that two strings are equal. - |
| TV-WG-003-007 | Westgard re-analyse status 2 #1 | rule-wg-viracor225.feature | Then well "A1" should have "A previous Westgard control has failed for this mix." outcome: Failed as |
| TV-WG-006-008 | Westgards 13s7t client case(viracor) #2 | rule-wg-viracor225.feature | Then well "A1" should have "Control Passed" outcome: Failed asserting that two strings are equal. -- |
| TV-WG-010-007 | Westgard re-analyse different dates #2 | rule-wg-viracor225.feature | Then well "A1" should have "Control Passed" outcome: Failed asserting that two strings are equal. -- |
| TV-WG-012-005 | Westgards 13s7t client case(viracor) #2 | rule-wg-viracor225.feature | Then well "A1" should have "Control Passed" outcome: Failed asserting that two strings are equal. -- |
| TV-WG-012-007 | Westgards 13s7t client case(viracor) #2 | rule-wg-viracor225.feature | Then well "A1" should have "Control Passed" outcome: Failed asserting that two strings are equal. -- |
| TV-WG-013-001 | Westgards 13s7t client case(viracor) #2 | rule-wg-viracor225.feature | Then well "A1" should have "Control Passed" outcome: Failed asserting that two strings are equal. -- |
| TV-WG-013-003 | WG7T13S does not trigger when trend direction mismatches delta direction | 39_BT-9517_wg-boundary.feature | Then well "A1" should have "Control Passed" outcome: Failed asserting that two strings are equal. -- |
| TV-WG-013-004 | Westgards 13s7t client case(viracor) #2 | rule-wg-viracor225.feature | Then well "A1" should have "Control Passed" outcome: Failed asserting that two strings are equal. -- |
| TV-WG-013-005 | Westgards 13s7t client case(viracor) #2 | rule-wg-viracor225.feature | Then well "A1" should have "Control Passed" outcome: Failed asserting that two strings are equal. -- |
| TV-WG-013-006 | Westgards 13s7t client case(viracor) #2 | rule-wg-viracor225.feature | Then well "A1" should have "Control Passed" outcome: Failed asserting that two strings are equal. -- |
| TV-WG-013-008 | Westgards 13s7t client case(viracor) #2 | rule-wg-viracor225.feature | Then well "A1" should have "Control Passed" outcome: Failed asserting that two strings are equal. -- |
| TV-WG-013-009 | Westgards 13s7t client case(viracor) #2 | rule-wg-viracor225.feature | Then well "A1" should have "Control Passed" outcome: Failed asserting that two strings are equal. -- |
| TV-WG-013-010 | Westgards 13s7t client case(viracor) #2 | rule-wg-viracor225.feature | Then well "A1" should have "Control Passed" outcome: Failed asserting that two strings are equal. -- |
| TV-WG-002-005 | Westgard re-analyse different dates #2 | rule-wg-viracor225.feature | Then well "A1" should have "Control Passed" outcome: Failed asserting that two strings are equal. -- |
| TV-WG-002-006 | Westgard re-analyse different dates #2 | rule-wg-viracor225.feature | Then well "A1" should have "Control Passed" outcome: Failed asserting that two strings are equal. -- |
| TV-WG-003-001 | Westgard 3 runs test #1 | rule-wg-viracor225.feature | And well "A41" should have "Control Passed" outcome: Failed asserting that two strings are equal. -- |
| TV-WG-003-001 | Westgard 3 runs test #2 | rule-wg-viracor225.feature | Then well "A41" should have "Control Passed" outcome: Failed asserting that two strings are equal. - |
| TV-WG-003-003 | Westgard re-analyse different dates #2 | rule-wg-viracor225.feature | Then well "A1" should have "Control Passed" outcome: Failed asserting that two strings are equal. -- |
| TV-WG-003-004 | Westgard 3 runs test #1 | rule-wg-viracor225.feature | And well "A41" should have "Control Passed" outcome: Failed asserting that two strings are equal. -- |
| TV-WG-003-004 | Westgard 3 runs test #2 | rule-wg-viracor225.feature | Then well "A41" should have "Control Passed" outcome: Failed asserting that two strings are equal. - |
| TV-WG-003-007 | Westgard re-analyse status 2 #1 | rule-wg-viracor225.feature | Then well "A1" should have "A previous Westgard control has failed for this mix." outcome: Failed as |
| TV-WG-006-008 | Westgards 13s7t client case(viracor) #2 | rule-wg-viracor225.feature | Then well "A1" should have "Control Passed" outcome: Failed asserting that two strings are equal. -- |
| TV-WG-010-007 | Westgard re-analyse different dates #2 | rule-wg-viracor225.feature | Then well "A1" should have "Control Passed" outcome: Failed asserting that two strings are equal. -- |
| TV-WG-012-005 | Westgards 13s7t client case(viracor) #2 | rule-wg-viracor225.feature | Then well "A1" should have "Control Passed" outcome: Failed asserting that two strings are equal. -- |
| TV-WG-012-007 | Westgards 13s7t client case(viracor) #2 | rule-wg-viracor225.feature | Then well "A1" should have "Control Passed" outcome: Failed asserting that two strings are equal. -- |
| TV-WG-013-001 | Westgards 13s7t client case(viracor) #2 | rule-wg-viracor225.feature | Then well "A1" should have "Control Passed" outcome: Failed asserting that two strings are equal. -- |
| TV-WG-013-003 | WG7T13S does not trigger when trend direction mismatches delta direction | 39_BT-9517_wg-boundary.feature | Then well "A1" should have "Control Passed" outcome: Failed asserting that two strings are equal. -- |
| TV-WG-013-004 | Westgards 13s7t client case(viracor) #2 | rule-wg-viracor225.feature | Then well "A1" should have "Control Passed" outcome: Failed asserting that two strings are equal. -- |
| TV-WG-013-005 | Westgards 13s7t client case(viracor) #2 | rule-wg-viracor225.feature | Then well "A1" should have "Control Passed" outcome: Failed asserting that two strings are equal. -- |
| TV-WG-013-006 | Westgards 13s7t client case(viracor) #2 | rule-wg-viracor225.feature | Then well "A1" should have "Control Passed" outcome: Failed asserting that two strings are equal. -- |
| TV-WG-013-008 | Westgards 13s7t client case(viracor) #2 | rule-wg-viracor225.feature | Then well "A1" should have "Control Passed" outcome: Failed asserting that two strings are equal. -- |
| TV-WG-013-009 | Westgards 13s7t client case(viracor) #2 | rule-wg-viracor225.feature | Then well "A1" should have "Control Passed" outcome: Failed asserting that two strings are equal. -- |
| TV-WG-013-010 | Westgards 13s7t client case(viracor) #2 | rule-wg-viracor225.feature | Then well "A1" should have "Control Passed" outcome: Failed asserting that two strings are equal. -- |
| TV-WG-002-005 | Westgard re-analyse different dates #2 | rule-wg-viracor225.feature | Then well "A1" should have "Control Passed" outcome: Failed asserting that two strings are equal. -- |
| TV-WG-002-006 | Westgard re-analyse different dates #2 | rule-wg-viracor225.feature | Then well "A1" should have "Control Passed" outcome: Failed asserting that two strings are equal. -- |
| TV-WG-003-001 | Westgard 3 runs test #1 | rule-wg-viracor225.feature | And well "A41" should have "Control Passed" outcome: Failed asserting that two strings are equal. -- |
| TV-WG-003-001 | Westgard 3 runs test #2 | rule-wg-viracor225.feature | Then well "A41" should have "Control Passed" outcome: Failed asserting that two strings are equal. - |
| TV-WG-003-003 | Westgard re-analyse different dates #2 | rule-wg-viracor225.feature | Then well "A1" should have "Control Passed" outcome: Failed asserting that two strings are equal. -- |
| TV-WG-003-004 | Westgard 3 runs test #1 | rule-wg-viracor225.feature | And well "A41" should have "Control Passed" outcome: Failed asserting that two strings are equal. -- |
| TV-WG-003-004 | Westgard 3 runs test #2 | rule-wg-viracor225.feature | Then well "A41" should have "Control Passed" outcome: Failed asserting that two strings are equal. - |
| TV-WG-003-007 | Westgard re-analyse status 2 #1 | rule-wg-viracor225.feature | Then well "A1" should have "A previous Westgard control has failed for this mix." outcome: Failed as |
| TV-WG-006-008 | Westgards 13s7t client case(viracor) #2 | rule-wg-viracor225.feature | Then well "A1" should have "Control Passed" outcome: Failed asserting that two strings are equal. -- |
| TV-WG-010-007 | Westgard re-analyse different dates #2 | rule-wg-viracor225.feature | Then well "A1" should have "Control Passed" outcome: Failed asserting that two strings are equal. -- |
| TV-WG-012-005 | Westgards 13s7t client case(viracor) #2 | rule-wg-viracor225.feature | Then well "A1" should have "Control Passed" outcome: Failed asserting that two strings are equal. -- |
| TV-WG-012-007 | Westgards 13s7t client case(viracor) #2 | rule-wg-viracor225.feature | Then well "A1" should have "Control Passed" outcome: Failed asserting that two strings are equal. -- |
| TV-WG-013-001 | Westgards 13s7t client case(viracor) #2 | rule-wg-viracor225.feature | Then well "A1" should have "Control Passed" outcome: Failed asserting that two strings are equal. -- |
| TV-WG-013-003 | WG7T13S does not trigger when trend direction mismatches delta direction | 39_BT-9517_wg-boundary.feature | Then well "A1" should have "Control Passed" outcome: Failed asserting that two strings are equal. -- |
| TV-WG-013-004 | Westgards 13s7t client case(viracor) #2 | rule-wg-viracor225.feature | Then well "A1" should have "Control Passed" outcome: Failed asserting that two strings are equal. -- |
| TV-WG-013-005 | Westgards 13s7t client case(viracor) #2 | rule-wg-viracor225.feature | Then well "A1" should have "Control Passed" outcome: Failed asserting that two strings are equal. -- |
| TV-WG-013-006 | Westgards 13s7t client case(viracor) #2 | rule-wg-viracor225.feature | Then well "A1" should have "Control Passed" outcome: Failed asserting that two strings are equal. -- |
| TV-WG-013-008 | Westgards 13s7t client case(viracor) #2 | rule-wg-viracor225.feature | Then well "A1" should have "Control Passed" outcome: Failed asserting that two strings are equal. -- |
| TV-WG-013-009 | Westgards 13s7t client case(viracor) #2 | rule-wg-viracor225.feature | Then well "A1" should have "Control Passed" outcome: Failed asserting that two strings are equal. -- |
| TV-WG-013-010 | Westgards 13s7t client case(viracor) #2 | rule-wg-viracor225.feature | Then well "A1" should have "Control Passed" outcome: Failed asserting that two strings are equal. -- |
| TV-WG-002-005 | Westgard re-analyse different dates #2 | rule-wg-viracor225.feature | Then well "A1" should have "Control Passed" outcome: Failed asserting that two strings are equal. -- |
| TV-WG-002-006 | Westgard re-analyse different dates #2 | rule-wg-viracor225.feature | Then well "A1" should have "Control Passed" outcome: Failed asserting that two strings are equal. -- |
| TV-WG-003-001 | Westgard 3 runs test #1 | rule-wg-viracor225.feature | And well "A41" should have "Control Passed" outcome: Failed asserting that two strings are equal. -- |
| TV-WG-003-001 | Westgard 3 runs test #2 | rule-wg-viracor225.feature | Then well "A41" should have "Control Passed" outcome: Failed asserting that two strings are equal. - |
| TV-WG-003-003 | Westgard re-analyse different dates #2 | rule-wg-viracor225.feature | Then well "A1" should have "Control Passed" outcome: Failed asserting that two strings are equal. -- |
| TV-WG-003-004 | Westgard 3 runs test #1 | rule-wg-viracor225.feature | And well "A41" should have "Control Passed" outcome: Failed asserting that two strings are equal. -- |
| TV-WG-003-004 | Westgard 3 runs test #2 | rule-wg-viracor225.feature | Then well "A41" should have "Control Passed" outcome: Failed asserting that two strings are equal. - |
| TV-WG-003-007 | Westgard re-analyse status 2 #1 | rule-wg-viracor225.feature | Then well "A1" should have "A previous Westgard control has failed for this mix." outcome: Failed as |
| TV-WG-006-008 | Westgards 13s7t client case(viracor) #2 | rule-wg-viracor225.feature | Then well "A1" should have "Control Passed" outcome: Failed asserting that two strings are equal. -- |
| TV-WG-010-007 | Westgard re-analyse different dates #2 | rule-wg-viracor225.feature | Then well "A1" should have "Control Passed" outcome: Failed asserting that two strings are equal. -- |
| TV-WG-012-005 | Westgards 13s7t client case(viracor) #2 | rule-wg-viracor225.feature | Then well "A1" should have "Control Passed" outcome: Failed asserting that two strings are equal. -- |
| TV-WG-012-007 | Westgards 13s7t client case(viracor) #2 | rule-wg-viracor225.feature | Then well "A1" should have "Control Passed" outcome: Failed asserting that two strings are equal. -- |
| TV-WG-013-001 | Westgards 13s7t client case(viracor) #2 | rule-wg-viracor225.feature | Then well "A1" should have "Control Passed" outcome: Failed asserting that two strings are equal. -- |
| TV-WG-013-003 | WG7T13S does not trigger when trend direction mismatches delta direction | 39_BT-9517_wg-boundary.feature | Then well "A1" should have "Control Passed" outcome: Failed asserting that two strings are equal. -- |
| TV-WG-013-004 | Westgards 13s7t client case(viracor) #2 | rule-wg-viracor225.feature | Then well "A1" should have "Control Passed" outcome: Failed asserting that two strings are equal. -- |
| TV-WG-013-005 | Westgards 13s7t client case(viracor) #2 | rule-wg-viracor225.feature | Then well "A1" should have "Control Passed" outcome: Failed asserting that two strings are equal. -- |
| TV-WG-013-006 | Westgards 13s7t client case(viracor) #2 | rule-wg-viracor225.feature | Then well "A1" should have "Control Passed" outcome: Failed asserting that two strings are equal. -- |
| TV-WG-013-008 | Westgards 13s7t client case(viracor) #2 | rule-wg-viracor225.feature | Then well "A1" should have "Control Passed" outcome: Failed asserting that two strings are equal. -- |
| TV-WG-013-009 | Westgards 13s7t client case(viracor) #2 | rule-wg-viracor225.feature | Then well "A1" should have "Control Passed" outcome: Failed asserting that two strings are equal. -- |
| TV-WG-013-010 | Westgards 13s7t client case(viracor) #2 | rule-wg-viracor225.feature | Then well "A1" should have "Control Passed" outcome: Failed asserting that two strings are equal. -- |
| TV-WG-002-005 | Westgard re-analyse different dates #2 | rule-wg-viracor225.feature | Then well "A1" should have "Control Passed" outcome: Failed asserting that two strings are equal. -- |
| TV-WG-002-006 | Westgard re-analyse different dates #2 | rule-wg-viracor225.feature | Then well "A1" should have "Control Passed" outcome: Failed asserting that two strings are equal. -- |
| TV-WG-003-001 | Westgard 3 runs test #1 | rule-wg-viracor225.feature | And well "A41" should have "Control Passed" outcome: Failed asserting that two strings are equal. -- |
| TV-WG-003-001 | Westgard 3 runs test #2 | rule-wg-viracor225.feature | Then well "A41" should have "Control Passed" outcome: Failed asserting that two strings are equal. - |
| TV-WG-003-003 | Westgard re-analyse different dates #2 | rule-wg-viracor225.feature | Then well "A1" should have "Control Passed" outcome: Failed asserting that two strings are equal. -- |
| TV-WG-003-004 | Westgard 3 runs test #1 | rule-wg-viracor225.feature | And well "A41" should have "Control Passed" outcome: Failed asserting that two strings are equal. -- |
| TV-WG-003-004 | Westgard 3 runs test #2 | rule-wg-viracor225.feature | Then well "A41" should have "Control Passed" outcome: Failed asserting that two strings are equal. - |
| TV-WG-003-007 | Westgard re-analyse status 2 #1 | rule-wg-viracor225.feature | Then well "A1" should have "A previous Westgard control has failed for this mix." outcome: Failed as |
| TV-WG-006-008 | Westgards 13s7t client case(viracor) #2 | rule-wg-viracor225.feature | Then well "A1" should have "Control Passed" outcome: Failed asserting that two strings are equal. -- |
| TV-WG-010-007 | Westgard re-analyse different dates #2 | rule-wg-viracor225.feature | Then well "A1" should have "Control Passed" outcome: Failed asserting that two strings are equal. -- |
| TV-WG-012-005 | Westgards 13s7t client case(viracor) #2 | rule-wg-viracor225.feature | Then well "A1" should have "Control Passed" outcome: Failed asserting that two strings are equal. -- |
| TV-WG-012-007 | Westgards 13s7t client case(viracor) #2 | rule-wg-viracor225.feature | Then well "A1" should have "Control Passed" outcome: Failed asserting that two strings are equal. -- |
| TV-WG-013-001 | Westgards 13s7t client case(viracor) #2 | rule-wg-viracor225.feature | Then well "A1" should have "Control Passed" outcome: Failed asserting that two strings are equal. -- |
| TV-WG-013-003 | WG7T13S does not trigger when trend direction mismatches delta direction | 39_BT-9517_wg-boundary.feature | Then well "A1" should have "Control Passed" outcome: Failed asserting that two strings are equal. -- |
| TV-WG-013-004 | Westgards 13s7t client case(viracor) #2 | rule-wg-viracor225.feature | Then well "A1" should have "Control Passed" outcome: Failed asserting that two strings are equal. -- |
| TV-WG-013-005 | Westgards 13s7t client case(viracor) #2 | rule-wg-viracor225.feature | Then well "A1" should have "Control Passed" outcome: Failed asserting that two strings are equal. -- |
| TV-WG-013-006 | Westgards 13s7t client case(viracor) #2 | rule-wg-viracor225.feature | Then well "A1" should have "Control Passed" outcome: Failed asserting that two strings are equal. -- |
| TV-WG-013-008 | Westgards 13s7t client case(viracor) #2 | rule-wg-viracor225.feature | Then well "A1" should have "Control Passed" outcome: Failed asserting that two strings are equal. -- |
| TV-WG-013-009 | Westgards 13s7t client case(viracor) #2 | rule-wg-viracor225.feature | Then well "A1" should have "Control Passed" outcome: Failed asserting that two strings are equal. -- |
| TV-WG-013-010 | Westgards 13s7t client case(viracor) #2 | rule-wg-viracor225.feature | Then well "A1" should have "Control Passed" outcome: Failed asserting that two strings are equal. -- |
| TV-WG-002-005 | Westgard re-analyse different dates #2 | rule-wg-viracor225.feature | Then well "A1" should have "Control Passed" outcome: Failed asserting that two strings are equal. -- |
| TV-WG-002-006 | Westgard re-analyse different dates #2 | rule-wg-viracor225.feature | Then well "A1" should have "Control Passed" outcome: Failed asserting that two strings are equal. -- |
| TV-WG-003-001 | Westgard 3 runs test #1 | rule-wg-viracor225.feature | And well "A41" should have "Control Passed" outcome: Failed asserting that two strings are equal. -- |
| TV-WG-003-001 | Westgard 3 runs test #2 | rule-wg-viracor225.feature | Then well "A41" should have "Control Passed" outcome: Failed asserting that two strings are equal. - |
| TV-WG-003-003 | Westgard re-analyse different dates #2 | rule-wg-viracor225.feature | Then well "A1" should have "Control Passed" outcome: Failed asserting that two strings are equal. -- |
| TV-WG-003-004 | Westgard 3 runs test #1 | rule-wg-viracor225.feature | And well "A41" should have "Control Passed" outcome: Failed asserting that two strings are equal. -- |
| TV-WG-003-004 | Westgard 3 runs test #2 | rule-wg-viracor225.feature | Then well "A41" should have "Control Passed" outcome: Failed asserting that two strings are equal. - |
| TV-WG-003-007 | Westgard re-analyse status 2 #1 | rule-wg-viracor225.feature | Then well "A1" should have "A previous Westgard control has failed for this mix." outcome: Failed as |
| TV-WG-006-008 | Westgards 13s7t client case(viracor) #2 | rule-wg-viracor225.feature | Then well "A1" should have "Control Passed" outcome: Failed asserting that two strings are equal. -- |
| TV-WG-010-007 | Westgard re-analyse different dates #2 | rule-wg-viracor225.feature | Then well "A1" should have "Control Passed" outcome: Failed asserting that two strings are equal. -- |
| TV-WG-012-005 | Westgards 13s7t client case(viracor) #2 | rule-wg-viracor225.feature | Then well "A1" should have "Control Passed" outcome: Failed asserting that two strings are equal. -- |
| TV-WG-012-007 | Westgards 13s7t client case(viracor) #2 | rule-wg-viracor225.feature | Then well "A1" should have "Control Passed" outcome: Failed asserting that two strings are equal. -- |
| TV-WG-013-001 | Westgards 13s7t client case(viracor) #2 | rule-wg-viracor225.feature | Then well "A1" should have "Control Passed" outcome: Failed asserting that two strings are equal. -- |
| TV-WG-013-003 | WG7T13S does not trigger when trend direction mismatches delta direction | 39_BT-9517_wg-boundary.feature | Then well "A1" should have "Control Passed" outcome: Failed asserting that two strings are equal. -- |
| TV-WG-013-004 | Westgards 13s7t client case(viracor) #2 | rule-wg-viracor225.feature | Then well "A1" should have "Control Passed" outcome: Failed asserting that two strings are equal. -- |
| TV-WG-013-005 | Westgards 13s7t client case(viracor) #2 | rule-wg-viracor225.feature | Then well "A1" should have "Control Passed" outcome: Failed asserting that two strings are equal. -- |
| TV-WG-013-006 | Westgards 13s7t client case(viracor) #2 | rule-wg-viracor225.feature | Then well "A1" should have "Control Passed" outcome: Failed asserting that two strings are equal. -- |
| TV-WG-013-008 | Westgards 13s7t client case(viracor) #2 | rule-wg-viracor225.feature | Then well "A1" should have "Control Passed" outcome: Failed asserting that two strings are equal. -- |
| TV-WG-013-009 | Westgards 13s7t client case(viracor) #2 | rule-wg-viracor225.feature | Then well "A1" should have "Control Passed" outcome: Failed asserting that two strings are equal. -- |
| TV-WG-013-010 | Westgards 13s7t client case(viracor) #2 | rule-wg-viracor225.feature | Then well "A1" should have "Control Passed" outcome: Failed asserting that two strings are equal. -- |
| TV-WG-002-005 | Westgard re-analyse different dates #2 | rule-wg-viracor225.feature | Then well "A1" should have "Control Passed" outcome: Failed asserting that two strings are equal. -- |
| TV-WG-002-006 | Westgard re-analyse different dates #2 | rule-wg-viracor225.feature | Then well "A1" should have "Control Passed" outcome: Failed asserting that two strings are equal. -- |
| TV-WG-003-001 | Westgard 3 runs test #1 | rule-wg-viracor225.feature | And well "A41" should have "Control Passed" outcome: Failed asserting that two strings are equal. -- |
| TV-WG-003-001 | Westgard 3 runs test #2 | rule-wg-viracor225.feature | Then well "A41" should have "Control Passed" outcome: Failed asserting that two strings are equal. - |
| TV-WG-003-003 | Westgard re-analyse different dates #2 | rule-wg-viracor225.feature | Then well "A1" should have "Control Passed" outcome: Failed asserting that two strings are equal. -- |
| TV-WG-003-004 | Westgard 3 runs test #1 | rule-wg-viracor225.feature | And well "A41" should have "Control Passed" outcome: Failed asserting that two strings are equal. -- |
| TV-WG-003-004 | Westgard 3 runs test #2 | rule-wg-viracor225.feature | Then well "A41" should have "Control Passed" outcome: Failed asserting that two strings are equal. - |
| TV-WG-003-007 | Westgard re-analyse status 2 #1 | rule-wg-viracor225.feature | Then well "A1" should have "A previous Westgard control has failed for this mix." outcome: Failed as |
| TV-WG-006-008 | Westgards 13s7t client case(viracor) #2 | rule-wg-viracor225.feature | Then well "A1" should have "Control Passed" outcome: Failed asserting that two strings are equal. -- |
| TV-WG-010-007 | Westgard re-analyse different dates #2 | rule-wg-viracor225.feature | Then well "A1" should have "Control Passed" outcome: Failed asserting that two strings are equal. -- |
| TV-WG-012-005 | Westgards 13s7t client case(viracor) #2 | rule-wg-viracor225.feature | Then well "A1" should have "Control Passed" outcome: Failed asserting that two strings are equal. -- |
| TV-WG-012-007 | Westgards 13s7t client case(viracor) #2 | rule-wg-viracor225.feature | Then well "A1" should have "Control Passed" outcome: Failed asserting that two strings are equal. -- |
| TV-WG-013-001 | Westgards 13s7t client case(viracor) #2 | rule-wg-viracor225.feature | Then well "A1" should have "Control Passed" outcome: Failed asserting that two strings are equal. -- |
| TV-WG-013-003 | WG7T13S does not trigger when trend direction mismatches delta direction | 39_BT-9517_wg-boundary.feature | Then well "A1" should have "Control Passed" outcome: Failed asserting that two strings are equal. -- |
| TV-WG-013-004 | Westgards 13s7t client case(viracor) #2 | rule-wg-viracor225.feature | Then well "A1" should have "Control Passed" outcome: Failed asserting that two strings are equal. -- |
| TV-WG-013-005 | Westgards 13s7t client case(viracor) #2 | rule-wg-viracor225.feature | Then well "A1" should have "Control Passed" outcome: Failed asserting that two strings are equal. -- |
| TV-WG-013-006 | Westgards 13s7t client case(viracor) #2 | rule-wg-viracor225.feature | Then well "A1" should have "Control Passed" outcome: Failed asserting that two strings are equal. -- |
| TV-WG-013-008 | Westgards 13s7t client case(viracor) #2 | rule-wg-viracor225.feature | Then well "A1" should have "Control Passed" outcome: Failed asserting that two strings are equal. -- |
| TV-WG-013-009 | Westgards 13s7t client case(viracor) #2 | rule-wg-viracor225.feature | Then well "A1" should have "Control Passed" outcome: Failed asserting that two strings are equal. -- |
| TV-WG-013-010 | Westgards 13s7t client case(viracor) #2 | rule-wg-viracor225.feature | Then well "A1" should have "Control Passed" outcome: Failed asserting that two strings are equal. -- |